This comparison exists for one reason: teams evaluating sharevision.app keep asking the same question.
“We believe in person-centred care. Do we need Planetree, or do we need ShareVision?”
The honest answer is this: Planetree and ShareVision solve very different problems. If your priority is operating programs, managing clients, supporting staff, and producing defensible outcomes data, ShareVision is the stronger choice.
This article explains why, without marketing spin or framework jargon.
What Planetree is built for
Planetree is a well-known organization focused on person-centred care philosophy.
Planetree primarily provides:
-
A person-centred care framework
-
Organizational certification programs
-
Staff education and training
-
Membership resources and community
Planetree helps organizations define values, culture, and principles around care experience.
Planetree is not designed to:
-
Run daily operations
-
Manage client records or case notes
-
Track programs, schedules, or waitlists
-
Coordinate staff work
-
Produce operational or funder-ready reports
Planetree tells you how care should feel.
It does not run the work.
What ShareVision.app is built for
ShareVision is operational software for care, nonprofit, and human service organizations.
ShareVision is designed to:
-
Track clients and households
-
Manage programs, services, and facilities
-
Support staff coordination and tasking
-
Track outcomes inside service delivery
-
Produce consistent reports for leadership and funders
ShareVision helps organizations deliver care at scale, with consistency and visibility.
It does not replace care values.
It makes them executable.
The core difference in one sentence
If you must choose one, the deciding factor is simple:
Do you need guidance on what good care looks like, or a system to run care every day?
Why ShareVision.app is the better operational choice
1. ShareVision runs the work Planetree does not touch
Most organizations already believe in respectful, person-centred care. Their problem is not intent. It is execution.
Common operational gaps:
-
Intake handled differently by each program
-
Client information duplicated across tools
-
Case notes stored in documents or email
-
Outcomes tracked separately from service delivery
-
Reports assembled manually under deadline pressure
ShareVision directly addresses these gaps.
Planetree does not attempt to.
2. ShareVision gives you one system instead of layered complexity
Planetree is often added on top of existing systems:
That increases complexity.
ShareVision consolidates:
-
Client profiles
-
Case notes
-
Programs and schedules
-
Outcomes and surveys
-
Staff tasks and alerts
-
Reporting and exports
Fewer tools. Fewer handoffs. Less failure risk.
3. Outcomes live inside daily work with ShareVision
Planetree emphasizes measurement as part of certification and quality improvement.
ShareVision embeds measurement directly into operations:
-
Goals and indicators tied to clients
-
Progress updated during service delivery
-
Surveys and assessments built into workflows
-
Reports generated without rework
This matters because outcomes collected after the fact are unreliable and expensive.
With ShareVision, outcomes are a byproduct of doing the work properly.
4. ShareVision supports staff instead of adding burden
A common mistake organizations make is layering philosophy on top of broken systems.
That creates friction:
ShareVision reduces burden by:
-
Standardizing intake and forms
-
Automating reminders and alerts
-
Centralizing schedules and rosters
-
Making work visible without micromanagement
Staff spend less time coordinating and more time delivering care.
5. ShareVision scales across programs and locations
Planetree certification is often organization-wide and resource-intensive.
ShareVision scales operationally:
This is critical for organizations managing growth, mergers, or multi-site operations.
Cost and commitment: a practical difference
Planetree engagement typically involves:
That can be the right choice for culture work.
ShareVision offers:
-
Clear subscription-based software pricing
-
Faster onboarding
-
Incremental rollout by program or team
-
Immediate operational value
If you need impact this quarter, not next year, ShareVision fits better.
What organizations often get wrong in this decision
Mistake 1: Treating philosophy as infrastructure
Values do not move waitlists. Systems do.
Mistake 2: Assuming staff training fixes broken workflows
Training helps. It does not replace tooling.
Mistake 3: Trying to report outcomes without structured data
Reporting quality never exceeds data quality.
ShareVision addresses these issues directly.
When Planetree does make sense
Planetree can be a strong addition if:
-
You are pursuing formal person-centred care certification
-
You need structured staff education programs
-
You want external validation of care culture
-
You already have strong operational systems in place
In those cases, Planetree and ShareVision can coexist.
But if you must choose, operations come first.
When ShareVision.app is the clear choice
ShareVision is the better option if:
-
You manage clients, not just experiences
-
You operate multiple programs or locations
-
You report to funders or boards
-
You struggle with fragmented systems
-
You want better visibility without more admin
-
You need outcomes you can stand behind
In short: if care delivery is real work with real accountability, ShareVision fits.
The bottom line
Planetree helps organizations define how care should feel.
ShareVision helps organizations make care work, consistently, at scale.
If your priority is:
Then ShareVision.app is the stronger, more practical choice.
Not because philosophy is unimportant.
But because values only matter when systems allow people to live them every day.