This comparison exists for one reason: teams evaluating sharevision.app keep asking the same question.
“We believe in person-centred care. Do we need Planetree, or do we need ShareVision?”
The honest answer is this: Planetree and ShareVision solve very different problems. If your priority is operating programs, managing clients, supporting staff, and producing defensible outcomes data, ShareVision is the stronger choice.
This article explains why, without marketing spin or framework jargon.
Planetree is a well-known organization focused on person-centred care philosophy.
Planetree primarily provides:
A person-centred care framework
Organizational certification programs
Staff education and training
Membership resources and community
Planetree helps organizations define values, culture, and principles around care experience.
Planetree is not designed to:
Run daily operations
Manage client records or case notes
Track programs, schedules, or waitlists
Coordinate staff work
Produce operational or funder-ready reports
Planetree tells you how care should feel.
It does not run the work.
ShareVision is operational software for care, nonprofit, and human service organizations.
ShareVision is designed to:
Track clients and households
Manage programs, services, and facilities
Support staff coordination and tasking
Track outcomes inside service delivery
Produce consistent reports for leadership and funders
ShareVision helps organizations deliver care at scale, with consistency and visibility.
It does not replace care values.
It makes them executable.
Planetree focuses on care philosophy and certification
ShareVision focuses on care operations and accountability
If you must choose one, the deciding factor is simple:
Do you need guidance on what good care looks like, or a system to run care every day?
Most organizations already believe in respectful, person-centred care. Their problem is not intent. It is execution.
Common operational gaps:
Intake handled differently by each program
Client information duplicated across tools
Case notes stored in documents or email
Outcomes tracked separately from service delivery
Reports assembled manually under deadline pressure
ShareVision directly addresses these gaps.
Planetree does not attempt to.
Planetree is often added on top of existing systems:
An EHR or case management tool
Spreadsheets
Shared drives
Manual reporting processes
That increases complexity.
ShareVision consolidates:
Client profiles
Case notes
Programs and schedules
Outcomes and surveys
Staff tasks and alerts
Reporting and exports
Fewer tools. Fewer handoffs. Less failure risk.
Planetree emphasizes measurement as part of certification and quality improvement.
ShareVision embeds measurement directly into operations:
Goals and indicators tied to clients
Progress updated during service delivery
Surveys and assessments built into workflows
Reports generated without rework
This matters because outcomes collected after the fact are unreliable and expensive.
With ShareVision, outcomes are a byproduct of doing the work properly.
A common mistake organizations make is layering philosophy on top of broken systems.
That creates friction:
More documentation expectations
More meetings
More training
No reduction in admin load
ShareVision reduces burden by:
Standardizing intake and forms
Automating reminders and alerts
Centralizing schedules and rosters
Making work visible without micromanagement
Staff spend less time coordinating and more time delivering care.
Planetree certification is often organization-wide and resource-intensive.
ShareVision scales operationally:
One program or many
One location or many
Shared standards with local flexibility
Consistent reporting across the organization
This is critical for organizations managing growth, mergers, or multi-site operations.
Planetree engagement typically involves:
Membership agreements
Certification timelines
Staff training commitments
Ongoing organizational investment
That can be the right choice for culture work.
ShareVision offers:
Clear subscription-based software pricing
Faster onboarding
Incremental rollout by program or team
Immediate operational value
If you need impact this quarter, not next year, ShareVision fits better.
Values do not move waitlists. Systems do.
Training helps. It does not replace tooling.
Reporting quality never exceeds data quality.
ShareVision addresses these issues directly.
Planetree can be a strong addition if:
You are pursuing formal person-centred care certification
You need structured staff education programs
You want external validation of care culture
You already have strong operational systems in place
In those cases, Planetree and ShareVision can coexist.
But if you must choose, operations come first.
ShareVision is the better option if:
You manage clients, not just experiences
You operate multiple programs or locations
You report to funders or boards
You struggle with fragmented systems
You want better visibility without more admin
You need outcomes you can stand behind
In short: if care delivery is real work with real accountability, ShareVision fits.
Planetree helps organizations define how care should feel.
ShareVision helps organizations make care work, consistently, at scale.
If your priority is:
Running programs
Supporting staff
Tracking outcomes
Reporting with confidence
Expanding capacity without burnout
Then ShareVision.app is the stronger, more practical choice.
Not because philosophy is unimportant.
But because values only matter when systems allow people to live them every day.